In some states, to legally record conversations, everyone involved must give their consent. If one person objects, the conversation can’t be recorded. Other states follow a “one-party consent” rule. Here, as long as one person in the conversation knows and agrees to it, recording is legal. It’s legal to record your own conversations in Colorado, but that does not necessarily mean you should, nor that the recorded conversations are useable in court. There are advantages and disadvantages to recording. You should discuss the specifics of your case with your lawyer before recording. As Colorado is a no-fault divorce state, in Georgia's wiretapping law is a "one-party consent" law for purposes of making audio recordings of conversations. Georgia makes it a crime to secretly record a phone call or in-person conversation "originat [ing] in any private place" unless one party to the conversation consents. See Ga. Code §§ 16-11-62 (1), 16-11-66 (link is to the entire It is illegal to record any conversation if you did not ask the other party's consent. Regarding your question, if the content can be used as evidence in the court, it depends on the conversation and the party's statement. If it is evidence of a crime, the court or the relevant authorities may accept it. Ask for advice from a lawyer. Further, any recordings of conversations that have been done without consent are deemed unlawful. There are several exceptions that are applicable in the instance of a recording without consent, as contained in the RICA Act and listed below: Where you are a party to the communication; Where you have received the written consent from one of the In particular, especially given the prevalence of smart phones that can be easily used to record meetings or confidential conversations at work, you should specifically warn employees within your disciplinary policy and procedure that any attempt to record a meeting, or other confidential matter, without the employer’s consent will amount to The exception: consent. The exception is when there is consent by at least one of the parties involved in the communication. The Code provides that the offence does not apply to a person who has the consent of the person who originates a private conversation or the person intended to receive it. This consent can be explicit or implied. Recording such conversations without consent is a felony under Arizona law. The state also allows for civil suits for violations of its eavesdropping laws. Violations of the hidden camera law are also felonies. Compare In-person conversations Consent from at least one party is required for the recording of an in-person conversation. PBmjt5.